Webb v. Whitesell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Webb v. Whitesell

87 N.Y.S. 454

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.Y.S. 454 (Webb v. Whitesell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. Whitesell, 87 N.Y.S. 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The contract and the discharge of the plaintiff béfore its expiration being admitted, the case presents a sharp conflict of testimony as to whether the discharge was without cause or [455]*455for cause, and as to whether the contract was terminated by mutual consent. The case was one for the jury, and. it was fully and fairly submitted to them under a charge which carefully protected the rights of the defendant. Upon the whole case, no sufficient reason appears for disturbing the verdict.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The contract and the discharge of the plaintiff béfore its expiration being admitted, the case presents a sharp conflict of testimony as to whether the discharge was without cause or [455]*455for cause, and as to whether the contract was terminated by mutual consent. The case was one for the jury, and. it was fully and fairly submitted to them under a charge which carefully protected the rights of the defendant. Upon the whole case, no sufficient reason appears for disturbing the verdict.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.Y.S. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-whitesell-nyappterm-1904.