Webb v. White

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webb v. White

423 So. 2d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1982·No. No. AM-58·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McCORD, Judge.

Appellants’ contention that the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act [§ 627.730, et seq., Fla.Stat. (1981) ] denies them equal protection and due process under the law and access to the courts has been previously addressed and rejected by the Florida Supreme Court. Chapman v. Dillon, 415 So.2d 12 (Fla.1982). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint for damages.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and MILLS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCORD, Judge.

Appellants’ contention that the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act [§ 627.730, et seq., Fla.Stat. (1981) ] denies them equal protection and due process under the law and access to the courts has been previously addressed and rejected by the Florida Supreme Court. Chapman v. Dillon, 415 So.2d 12 (Fla.1982). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint for damages.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and MILLS, J., concur.

Webb v. White, 423 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

423 So. 2d 482 (Webb v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related