Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley

1 White & W. 789
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedNovember 23, 1880
DocketNo. 881, Op. Book No. 2, p. 691
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 789 (Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley, 1 White & W. 789 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

Walker, P. J.

§ 1349. Payment of a note given for land cannot be resisted where there is a general warranty, no fraud or ignorance, and no eviction. Where the vendee gives his note for the purchase money, and takes a deed with general warranty, and there is no fraud on the part of the vendor, nor ignorance on the part of the vendee as to a defect in the title, the vendee cannot successfully resist the payment of the note unless he has been evicted; proof of a paramount outstanding title in a third person is no defense. [Brock v. Southwick, 10 Tex. 65; Baldridge v. Cook, 27 Tex. 565.]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brock v. Southwick
10 Tex. 65 (Texas Supreme Court, 1853)
Baldridge v. Cook
27 Tex. 565 (Texas Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-waters-bivens-corley-texcommnapp-1880.