Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley

1 White & W. 789
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided November 23, 1880·No. No. 881, Op. Book No. 2, p. 691·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Walker, P. J.

§ 1349. Payment of a note given for land cannot be resisted where there is a general warranty, no fraud or ignorance, and no eviction. Where the vendee gives his note for the purchase money, and takes a deed with general warranty, and there is no fraud on the part of the vendor, nor ignorance on the part of the vendee as to a defect in the title, the vendee cannot successfully resist the payment of the note unless he has been evicted; proof of a paramount outstanding title in a third person is no defense. [Brock v. Southwick, 10 Tex. 65; Baldridge v. Cook, 27 Tex. 565.]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley, 1 White & W. 789 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1880).

1 White & W. 789 (Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brock v. Southwick
10 Tex. 65 (Texas Supreme Court, 1853)
Baldridge v. Cook
27 Tex. 565 (Texas Supreme Court, 1864)