Webb v. W. W. Development Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Webb v. W. W. Development Co.

267 So. 2d 621, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6648

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 19, 1972

DocketNo. 3947

StatusPublished

This text of 267 So. 2d 621 (Webb v. W. W. Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. W. W. Development Co., 267 So. 2d 621, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6648 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion suit, Lard Electric Company, Inc. v. Miller & Associates Construction Company, Inc., et al., 267 So.2d 616 (La.App.3rd Cir., 1972), decided this date, the portion of the judgment appealed from which found plaintiff’s lien untimely filed is reversed and defendants-appellees are held liable in solido with Miller & Associates Construction Company under LSA-R.S. 9:4812 for claims of plaintiff arising out of services performed on and materials delivered to appellees’ property under contract with Miller. (Such contract being issued under and as part of the prime contract work). This case is remanded for a determination of the amount of liability consistent with our findings in Lard Electric Company, Inc. v. Miller & Associates Construction Company, Inc., et al., supra. Appellees are to pay all costs of this appeal.

Reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion suit, Lard Electric Company, Inc. v. Miller & Associates Construction Company, Inc., et al., 267 So.2d 616 (La.App.3rd Cir., 1972), decided this date, the portion of the judgment appealed from which found plaintiff’s lien untimely filed is reversed and defendants-appellees are held liable in solido with Miller & Associates Construction Company under LSA-R.S. 9:4812 for claims of plaintiff arising out of services performed on and materials delivered to appellees’ property under contract with Miller. (Such contract being issued under and as part of the prime contract work). This case is remanded for a determination of the amount of liability consistent with our findings in Lard Electric Company, Inc. v. Miller & Associates Construction Company, Inc., et al., supra. Appellees are to pay all costs of this appeal.

Reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 So. 2d 621, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-w-w-development-co-lactapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack