Webb v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama·Decided February 11, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00899·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID WEBB, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 2:19-CV-899-WKW ) [WO] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER On December 6, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5.) Upon an independent review of the record and the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. Final judgment will be entered separately. Petitioner is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal this court’s judgment, should he desire to do so, because it is not “‘a final order in a habeas corpus proceeding’” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Hubbard v. Campbell, 379 F.3d 1245, 1247 (11th Cir. 2004) (quoting § 2253(c)). DONE this 11th day of February, 2020. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. United States of America (INMATE 3), (M.D. Ala. 2020).

Webb v. United States of America (INMATE 3) (Webb v. United States of America (INMATE 3)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James Barney Hubbard v. Donal Campbell
379 F.3d 1245 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)