Webb v. . Tomlinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Webb v. . Tomlinson

164 S.E. 341, 202 N.C. 860, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 291

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 15, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 164 S.E. 341 (Webb v. . Tomlinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. . Tomlinson, 164 S.E. 341, 202 N.C. 860, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 291 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The evidence on the mooted question as to whether the deceased was an employee or an independent contractor is susceptible of either interpretation. The findings of the Industrial Commission, therefore, are conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact. Parrish v. Armour Co., 200 N. C., 654, 158 S. E., 188; Rice v. Panel Co., 199 N. C., 154, 154 S. E., 69.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The evidence on the mooted question as to whether the deceased was an employee or an independent contractor is susceptible of either interpretation. The findings of the Industrial Commission, therefore, are conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact. Parrish v. Armour Co., 200 N. C., 654, 158 S. E., 188; Rice v. Panel Co., 199 N. C., 154, 154 S. E., 69.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.E. 341, 202 N.C. 860, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-tomlinson-nc-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack