Webb v. Thompson

170 S.E. 372, 177 Ga. 455, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 323
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 8, 1933·No. No. 9186·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

When, in an application for injunction, the evidence is not embodied in an approved brief of evidence and filed as a part of the record, nor contained in the bill of exceptions, nor attached thereto properly identified as a part thereof by the judge’s signature, the Supreme court can not consider any question made by an assignment of error the decision of which is dependent upon the evidence. Edmondson v. Edmondson, 128 Ga. 53 (3) (57 S. E. 308), and cit.; Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226 (69 S. E. 110), and cit.; Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 160 Ga. 792 (129 S. E. 108) ; Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing, 165 Ga. 435 (141 S. E. 65), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bill, J., absent because of illness. Tho'mas E. Scott, for plaintiff in error. W. E. Harclerode, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. Thompson, 170 S.E. 372, 177 Ga. 455, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 323 (Ga. 1933).

170 S.E. 372 (Webb v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edmondson v. Edmondson
57 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Blackman v. Garrett
69 S.E. 110 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson
129 S.E. 108 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing
141 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)