Webb v. Thompson
This text of 170 S.E. 372 (Webb v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When, in an application for injunction, the evidence is not embodied in an approved brief of evidence and filed as a part of the record, nor contained in the bill of exceptions, nor attached thereto properly identified as a part thereof by the judge’s signature, the Supreme court can not consider any question made by an assignment of error the decision of which is dependent upon the evidence. Edmondson v. Edmondson, 128 Ga. 53 (3) (57 S. E. 308), and cit.; Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226 (69 S. E. 110), and cit.; Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 160 Ga. 792 (129 S. E. 108) ; Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing, 165 Ga. 435 (141 S. E. 65), and cit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 S.E. 372, 177 Ga. 455, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-thompson-ga-1933.