Webb v. Thomas May Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webb v. Thomas May Construction Co.

958 So. 2d 1111, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9568, 2007 WL 1773189

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 21, 2007

DocketNo. 1D07-1021

StatusPublished

This text of 958 So. 2d 1111 (Webb v. Thomas May Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. Thomas May Construction Co., 958 So. 2d 1111, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9568, 2007 WL 1773189 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order requiring Rhonda Webb to submit to a psychological evaluation is quashed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360(a)(1) (2007) (“A party may request any other party to submit to ... examination by a qualified expert when the condition that is the subject of the requested examination is in controversy.”) (emphasis supplied). See also Olges v. Dougherty, 856 So.2d 6, 12 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“[O]nce [Mrs. Webb] abandoned h[er] original efforts to recover damages for mental anguish ..., h[er] mental condition ceased to be ‘in controversy’ as contemplated by [Rule 1.360(a)(1) ].”).

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order requiring Rhonda Webb to submit to a psychological evaluation is quashed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360(a)(1) (2007) (“A party may request any other party to submit to ... examination by a qualified expert when the condition that is the subject of the requested examination is in controversy.”) (emphasis supplied). See also Olges v. Dougherty, 856 So.2d 6, 12 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“[O]nce [Mrs. Webb] abandoned h[er] original efforts to recover damages for mental anguish ..., h[er] mental condition ceased to be ‘in controversy’ as contemplated by [Rule 1.360(a)(1) ].”).

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

958 So. 2d 1111, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9568, 2007 WL 1773189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-thomas-may-construction-co-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack