Webb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Webb v. State

492 S.W.2d 467, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2483

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 4, 1973

DocketNo. 44571

StatusPublished

This text of 492 S.W.2d 467 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. State, 492 S.W.2d 467, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2483 (Tex. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This burglary conviction was affirmed in Webb v. State, 480 S.W.2d 398 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). Petition for writ of certiorari was granted and the conviction was reversed by the United States Supreme Court. Webb v. Texas, 409 U.S. 95, 93 S.Ct. 351, 34 L.Ed.2d 330 (1972). The basis for the reversal was the trial judge’s admonishment to the petitioner’s only witness, who had a prior criminal record and was then [468]*468serving a prison sentence. The witness subsequently refused to testify. The Court wrote:

“In the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the judge’s threatening remarks, directed alone at the single witness for the defense, effectively drove that witness off the stand, and thus deprived the petitioner of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The admonition by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals might well have given the trial judge guidance for future cases, but it did not serve to repair the infringement of the petitioner’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.”

In light of the Supreme Court’s action, the order of affirmance is set aside, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

ROBERTS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This burglary conviction was affirmed in Webb v. State, 480 S.W.2d 398 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). Petition for writ of certiorari was granted and the conviction was reversed by the United States Supreme Court. Webb v. Texas, 409 U.S. 95, 93 S.Ct. 351, 34 L.Ed.2d 330 (1972). The basis for the reversal was the trial judge’s admonishment to the petitioner’s only witness, who had a prior criminal record and was then [468]*468serving a prison sentence. The witness subsequently refused to testify. The Court wrote:

“In the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the judge’s threatening remarks, directed alone at the single witness for the defense, effectively drove that witness off the stand, and thus deprived the petitioner of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The admonition by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals might well have given the trial judge guidance for future cases, but it did not serve to repair the infringement of the petitioner’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.”

In light of the Supreme Court’s action, the order of affirmance is set aside, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

ROBERTS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 S.W.2d 467, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack