Webb v. State

284 S.W. 587, 104 Tex. Crim. 470, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Webb v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Tex. Crim. 311
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 2, 1926·No. No. 10227.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for child desertion, punishment being assessed at thirty days’ confinement in the county jail.

No statement of facts accompanies the record, and there are no bills of exception save one complaining of the refusal of a special charge. No exceptions were filed to the charge given and this being a misdemeanor case it is necessary both to object to the court’s charge and supplement the same by special charges intended to cover any omission in the main charge.

For that reason and the additional one that in the absence of the facts proven this court is not able to appraise the applicability of the charge requested, no error is shown and the judgment is affirmed:

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. State, 284 S.W. 587, 104 Tex. Crim. 470, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 886 (Tex. 1926).

284 S.W. 587 (Webb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.