Webb v. State

32 Tex. 652
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Tex. 652 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. State, 32 Tex. 652 (Tex. 1870).

Opinion

Lindsay, J.

The recognizance in this case is defective, and the court can not entertain the appeal. There is neither the name of an offense recited in the recognizance, nor is there a state of facts set forth in it which constitutes an offense defined by the Criminal Code. The recognizance calls upon the defendant to answer to a charge of illegal marking,” without stating what was marked. Illegal marking ” of the property of another might be done without necessarily committing a penal offense. “ Illegal marking ” is not the name of any offense known to the penal law. If it were so, to mark another person’s goods and chattels of any kind, or character, would subject a party to a penal prosecution, when he might have committed only a trespass. And every trespass is not a penal offense. The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Tex. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-tex-1870.