Webb v. State of South Dakota

District Court, D. South Dakota·Decided December 27, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-03017·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION

DAVID Q. WEBB, 3:23-CV-03017-RAL : Plaintiff, SUA SPONTE ORDER RULING THAT vs. PLAINTIFF MAY PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, in its official capacity; PENNINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, in its official capacity; JANINE M. KERN, in her individual and official capacities; BRIAN MUELLER, Pennington County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities; LARA ROETZEL, Pennington County State Attorney, in her individual and official capacities; TIMOTHY RENSCH, in his individual capacity, Defendants.

Plaintiff David Q. Webb filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. Webb moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which this Court granted. Doc. 4; Doc. 7 at 7. This Court screened Webb’s complaint for dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and judgment was entered against Webb. Docs. 7, 8. Webb filed a notice of appeal but did not provide a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See Doc. 9. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3), “[a] party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action ... may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization” unless the appeal is not taken in good faith, the court “finds that the party is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis[,]” or a statute provides otherwise. “[I]n forma pauperis status does not require a litigant to demonstrate absolute

destitution.” Lee v. McDonald’s Corp., 231 F.3d 456, 459 (8th Cir. 2000). But in forma pauperis status is a privilege, not aright. Williams v. McKenzie, 834 F.2d 152, 154 (8th Cir. 1987) (citation omitted). It appears that Webb’s appeal is taken in good faith. Because this Court granted Webb leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action and nothing appears to have changed concerning his finances, he is granted leave to proceed in form pauperis on appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this Court sua sponte grants Webb leave to proceed in forma paupers on appeal. DATED December “, 2023. BY THE COURT:

CHIEF JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. State of South Dakota, (D.S.D. 2023).

Webb v. State of South Dakota (Webb v. State of South Dakota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doyle J. Williams v. Honorable Ronald R. McKenzie
834 F.2d 152 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Kevin R. Lee v. McDonald Corporation
231 F.3d 456 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)