Webb v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Webb v. State

447 S.W.3d 221, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2014 WL 5560781

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 4, 2014·No. WD 76822·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Jason Webb appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree assault, attempted first-degree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. Webb contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the State’s closing argument. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the post-conviction judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Jason Webb appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree assault, attempted first-degree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. Webb contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the State’s closing argument. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the post-conviction judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Webb v. State, 447 S.W.3d 221, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2014 WL 5560781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

447 S.W.3d 221 (Webb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.