Webb v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Webb v. State

297 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 2009 WL 3754000

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 10, 2009

DocketED 92162

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 S.W.3d 137 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. State, 297 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 2009 WL 3754000 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Webb appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Webb appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 2009 WL 3754000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack