Webb v. State
297 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 2009 WL 3754000
Opinion
ORDER
Kenneth Webb appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webb v. State, 297 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 2009 WL 3754000 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
297 S.W.3d 137 (Webb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayes v. State
297 S.W.3d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)