Webb v. State

21 Ind. 236
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1863
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ind. 236 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. State, 21 Ind. 236 (Ind. 1863).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Prosecution against Webb for larceny in stealing a horse. He was first arrested and committed upon an affidavit made before Mayor Cavin, of Indianapolis. Smithers. who made the affidavit, signed it below the jurat, between it and the name of the Mayor, who administered the oath to Smithers, and certifies to its having been taken. This is a mere informality.

The information charges that the defendant led and rode away the horse, being the personal goods and property of, &c.

It is urged that the defendant could not have both led anrode the horse away, and that the horse was not goods. The objection is insufficient.

An affidavit was made for a continuance; but the affiant did not know the names of the witnesses he wanted,, nor where they resided, or could be found. It was not error to refuse the continuance.

On the evidence, the conviction can not be disturbed. The horse had been taken in the night from the owner’s stable; the defendant was soon after seen in possession of it, and gave no reasonable account, &c.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ind. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-ind-1863.