Webb v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Webb v. State

38 S.E.2d 54, 73 Ga. App. 748, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 404

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 25, 1946

Docket31176.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 S.E.2d 54 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. State, 38 S.E.2d 54, 73 Ga. App. 748, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 404 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

1. “Tlie Supreme Court ‘has frequently decided that the judge may construct his charge upon the various issues made by the evidence; and that, if a defense is' set up in the statement alone, it is not error for the judge to omit submitting the law appropriate to such defense, in the absence of a timely written request.’ Watson v. State, 136 Ga. 236, 239 (71 S. E. 122); Carter v. State, 15 Ga. App. 343 *749 (83 S. E. 153); Wilensky v. State, 15 Ga. App. 360 (83 S. E. 276).” Gilley v. State, 72 Ga. App. 197 (33 S. E. 2d, 560).

Decided April 25, 1946. W. J. Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

2. Here there was no request to charge. The defendant introduced no evidence, hut in his statement to the jury denied that his confession was freely and voluntarily made. The judge in his charge treated the question, whether the confession was voluntarily made “without being induced by another, by the slightest hope of benefit or remotest fear of injury,” as issuable, and left it to the jury to say whether the confession had been freely and voluntarily made, as provided in the Code, § 38-411. He correctly charged the law applicable to confessions. Hawkins v. State, 6 Ga. App. 109 (64 S. E. 289). If the defendant had wished an elaboration of the charge actually given on confessions, he should have submitted a timely written request. Hood v. State, 67 Ga. App. 291 (2) (19 S. E. 2d, 227); McNabb v. State, 69 Ga. App. 885, 887 (27 S. E. 2d, 246).

3. A conviction may be lawfully had upon a free and voluntary confession and upon proof of circumstances sufficient in themselves to authorize the inference to be drawn by the jury that the corpus delicti was established. Byars v. State, 73 Ga. App. 727 (38 S. E. 2d, 53).

4. Under the foregoing rulings and the facta in the instant case, the jury were authorized to find from the evidence that the defendant was guilty of voluntary manslaughter as charged.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

1. “Tlie Supreme Court ‘has frequently decided that the judge may construct his charge upon the various issues made by the evidence; and that, if a defense is' set up in the statement alone, it is not error for the judge to omit submitting the law appropriate to such defense, in the absence of a timely written request.’ Watson v. State, 136 Ga. 236, 239 (71 S. E. 122); Carter v. State, 15 Ga. App. 343 *749 (83 S. E. 153); Wilensky v. State, 15 Ga. App. 360 (83 S. E. 276).” Gilley v. State, 72 Ga. App. 197 (33 S. E. 2d, 560).

Decided April 25, 1946. W. J. Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

2. Here there was no request to charge. The defendant introduced no evidence, hut in his statement to the jury denied that his confession was freely and voluntarily made. The judge in his charge treated the question, whether the confession was voluntarily made “without being induced by another, by the slightest hope of benefit or remotest fear of injury,” as issuable, and left it to the jury to say whether the confession had been freely and voluntarily made, as provided in the Code, § 38-411. He correctly charged the law applicable to confessions. Hawkins v. State, 6 Ga. App. 109 (64 S. E. 289). If the defendant had wished an elaboration of the charge actually given on confessions, he should have submitted a timely written request. Hood v. State, 67 Ga. App. 291 (2) (19 S. E. 2d, 227); McNabb v. State, 69 Ga. App. 885, 887 (27 S. E. 2d, 246).

3. A conviction may be lawfully had upon a free and voluntary confession and upon proof of circumstances sufficient in themselves to authorize the inference to be drawn by the jury that the corpus delicti was established. Byars v. State, 73 Ga. App. 727 (38 S. E. 2d, 53).

4. Under the foregoing rulings and the facta in the instant case, the jury were authorized to find from the evidence that the defendant was guilty of voluntary manslaughter as charged.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 S.E.2d 54, 73 Ga. App. 748, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-gactapp-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack