Webb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webb v. State

963 So. 2d 802, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392, 2007 WL 2118995

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 25, 2007

DocketNo. 3D07-851

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 963 So. 2d 802 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. State, 963 So. 2d 802, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392, 2007 WL 2118995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Defendant alleges that his prior juvenile adjudications cannot be used as predicate offenses. The State correctly points out that defendant’s motion is facially insufficient and was therefore properly denied. Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222, 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The State’s response nevertheless requests that we reverse and remand for further proceedings. As we can find no error in the trial court’s ruling, we decline the State’s entreaty. We treat the State’s response as a confession of error, deny the confession of error and affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Defendant alleges that his prior juvenile adjudications cannot be used as predicate offenses. The State correctly points out that defendant’s motion is facially insufficient and was therefore properly denied. Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222, 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The State’s response nevertheless requests that we reverse and remand for further proceedings. As we can find no error in the trial court’s ruling, we decline the State’s entreaty. We treat the State’s response as a confession of error, deny the confession of error and affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 So. 2d 802, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392, 2007 WL 2118995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack