Webb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webb v. State

613 So. 2d 615, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2245, 1993 WL 48250

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 1993

DocketNo. 91-02845

StatusPublished

This text of 613 So. 2d 615 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. State, 613 So. 2d 615, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2245, 1993 WL 48250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

Dorrell Webb appeals from an order imposing probation, arguing that the special conditions were not orally pronounced by the trial court. Webb’s history with the trial court reveals that the same conditions were imposed upon him in three prior probation orders. Thus, Webb and his attorney were aware of all special conditions. Because Webb did not challenge the reim-position of these conditions at sentencing, we affirm the order in all respects but one. We have declared special condition 18, requiring Webb to show respect to criminal justice officials, unconstitutionally vague. Knight v. State, 593 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm Webb’s- sentences but strike condition 18 from the order of probation.

PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

Dorrell Webb appeals from an order imposing probation, arguing that the special conditions were not orally pronounced by the trial court. Webb’s history with the trial court reveals that the same conditions were imposed upon him in three prior probation orders. Thus, Webb and his attorney were aware of all special conditions. Because Webb did not challenge the reim-position of these conditions at sentencing, we affirm the order in all respects but one. We have declared special condition 18, requiring Webb to show respect to criminal justice officials, unconstitutionally vague. Knight v. State, 593 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm Webb’s- sentences but strike condition 18 from the order of probation.

PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 615, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2245, 1993 WL 48250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack