Webb v. State

613 So. 2d 615, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2245, 1993 WL 48250
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Webb v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 609 So. 2d 728
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 1993·No. No. 91-02845·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

Dorrell Webb appeals from an order imposing probation, arguing that the special conditions were not orally pronounced by the trial court. Webb’s history with the trial court reveals that the same conditions were imposed upon him in three prior probation orders. Thus, Webb and his attorney were aware of all special conditions. Because Webb did not challenge the reim-position of these conditions at sentencing, we affirm the order in all respects but one. We have declared special condition 18, requiring Webb to show respect to criminal justice officials, unconstitutionally vague. Knight v. State, 593 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm Webb’s- sentences but strike condition 18 from the order of probation.

PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. State, 613 So. 2d 615, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2245, 1993 WL 48250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

613 So. 2d 615 (Webb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. State
593 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)