Webb v. State
This text of 2014 Ark. App. 637 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 637
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-14-279
MICHAEL WEBB, JR. Opinion Delivered November 12, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DREW V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2010-162-3A]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM APPELLEE GIBSON, JR., JUDGE
SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED
RITA W. GRUBER, Judge
Michael Webb, Jr., appeals the circuit court’s revocation of his probation. He raises
two points, contending (1) that the court’s finding that he violated terms of his probation by
constructively possessing a firearm and drugs was clearly against the preponderance of the
evidence, and (2) that his due-process rights were violated because the court considered
matters that were not contained in the State’s petition to revoke. The State responds that the
court did not err by finding that Webb violated terms of his probation;1 it does not respond
to the second point.
We remand for supplementation of the addendum to Webb’s brief because it lacks
important pages of the 2013 sentencing order. Without these pages, we are unable to confirm
that this is indeed a revocation case or to ascertain the underlying offenses. See Ark. Sup. Ct.
1 The State’s argument simply asserts that we should affirm the circuit court’s finding that appellant constructively possessed the drugs and the firearm. Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 637
R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2014) (requiring that the addendum to appellant’s brief include the order
from which the appeal is taken). We order Webb to file, within seven calendar days of this
opinion, a supplemental addendum providing the relevant pages from the record. Ark. Sup.
Ct. R. 4-2(b)(4) (2014). We also encourage review of our rules to ensure that no other
deficiencies are present.
WALMSLEY and HARRISON, JJ., agree.
Timothy R. Leonard, for appellant.
Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. App. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-arkctapp-2014.