Webb v. State

2014 Ark. App. 637
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 12, 2014
DocketCR-14-279
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 637 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 637 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 637

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-14-279

MICHAEL WEBB, JR. Opinion Delivered November 12, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DREW V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2010-162-3A]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM APPELLEE GIBSON, JR., JUDGE

SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

Michael Webb, Jr., appeals the circuit court’s revocation of his probation. He raises

two points, contending (1) that the court’s finding that he violated terms of his probation by

constructively possessing a firearm and drugs was clearly against the preponderance of the

evidence, and (2) that his due-process rights were violated because the court considered

matters that were not contained in the State’s petition to revoke. The State responds that the

court did not err by finding that Webb violated terms of his probation;1 it does not respond

to the second point.

We remand for supplementation of the addendum to Webb’s brief because it lacks

important pages of the 2013 sentencing order. Without these pages, we are unable to confirm

that this is indeed a revocation case or to ascertain the underlying offenses. See Ark. Sup. Ct.

1 The State’s argument simply asserts that we should affirm the circuit court’s finding that appellant constructively possessed the drugs and the firearm. Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 637

R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2014) (requiring that the addendum to appellant’s brief include the order

from which the appeal is taken). We order Webb to file, within seven calendar days of this

opinion, a supplemental addendum providing the relevant pages from the record. Ark. Sup.

Ct. R. 4-2(b)(4) (2014). We also encourage review of our rules to ensure that no other

deficiencies are present.

WALMSLEY and HARRISON, JJ., agree.

Timothy R. Leonard, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. State
2015 Ark. App. 257 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-state-arkctapp-2014.