Webb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Webb v. State

677 So. 2d 812, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 377, 1995 WL 668372

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedNovember 9, 1995

DocketCR-94-1567

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 677 So. 2d 812 (Webb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. State, 677 So. 2d 812, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 377, 1995 WL 668372 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant, Earnest Lee Webb, appeals from his conviction for first degree possession of marijuana. He was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

Webb contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve for appeal the issue of insufficiency of evidence and other related. issues. The attorney general correctly points out that this contention was not preserved for our review. See Ex parte Jackson, 598 So.2d 895 (Ala.1992).

Pursuant to the attorney general’s request for a remand for imposition of a fine as mandated by the Demand Reduction Assessment Act, § 13A-12-281, Ala.Code 1975, this case is remanded. See e.g., Fletcher v. State, 675 So.2d 55 (Ala.Cr.App.1995). The trial court shall take necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time and within 42 days of the release of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI