Webb v. Slaton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Webb v. Slaton

100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 491

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 19, 1919·No. 10165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Complaint is made that the court erred in admitting certain documentary evidence. This evidence is not set out either literally or in substance in the motion for a new trial, or attached thereto as an exhibit. Under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and the Supreme Court, such ground of a motion for a new trial cannot be considered. Walton v. Busby, 147 Ga. 487 (94 S. E. 562); Smith v. Leverett, 22 Ga. App. 290 (2) (96 S. E. 8).

2. The court did not err in any of its rulings on the pleadings, nor in the charge of which complaint is made, nor in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. Complaint is made that the court erred in admitting certain documentary evidence. This evidence is not set out either literally or in substance in the motion for a new trial, or attached thereto as an exhibit. Under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and the Supreme Court, such ground of a motion for a new trial cannot be considered. Walton v. Busby, 147 Ga. 487 (94 S. E. 562); Smith v. Leverett, 22 Ga. App. 290 (2) (96 S. E. 8).

2. The court did not err in any of its rulings on the pleadings, nor in the charge of which complaint is made, nor in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Webb v. Slaton, 100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

100 S.E. 227 (Webb v. Slaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related