Webb v. Slaton

100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 491
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 19, 1919
Docket10165
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 227 (Webb v. Slaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. Slaton, 100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Complaint is made that the court erred in admitting certain documentary evidence. This evidence is not set out either literally or in substance in the motion for a new trial, or attached thereto as an exhibit. Under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and the Supreme Court, such ground of a motion for a new trial cannot be considered. Walton v. Busby, 147 Ga. 487 (94 S. E. 562); Smith v. Leverett, 22 Ga. App. 290 (2) (96 S. E. 8).

2. The court did not err in any of its rulings on the pleadings, nor in the charge of which complaint is made, nor in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuggle v. Fisk Rubber Co.
106 S.E. 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-slaton-gactapp-1919.