Webb v. Slaton
This text of 100 S.E. 227 (Webb v. Slaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Complaint is made that the court erred in admitting certain documentary evidence. This evidence is not set out either literally or in substance in the motion for a new trial, or attached thereto as an exhibit. Under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and the Supreme Court, such ground of a motion for a new trial cannot be considered. Walton v. Busby, 147 Ga. 487 (94 S. E. 562); Smith v. Leverett, 22 Ga. App. 290 (2) (96 S. E. 8).
2. The court did not err in any of its rulings on the pleadings, nor in the charge of which complaint is made, nor in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-slaton-gactapp-1919.