Webb v. Samuel
This text of 2 Miles 201 (Webb v. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not necessary to consider more than the first reason assigned as to the defectiveness of the plea in abatement. The plea prays judgment generally of the writ and declaration thereon founded, whereas the objection presented by it, is merely in regard to one of the defendants. On the authority of Wade v. Shiff, 17 E. C. L. R. 162; judgment of respondeos ouster must be entered.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miles 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-samuel-pactcomplphilad-1838.