Webb v. Rice

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Webb v. Rice

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386 (Webb v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. Rice, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court held the evidence admissible, Bronson, J., dissenliente.

The Court of Errors reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court, holding that parol evidence was not-admissible in a court of law, to show that a deed, absolute on its face, was intended as a mortgage. The question whether even admissible in a court of equity, except on the ground of fraud, mistake or surprise, was raised, but not decided.

Judgment reversed, 2 only voting for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court held the evidence admissible, Bronson, J., dissenliente.

The Court of Errors reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court, holding that parol evidence was not-admissible in a court of law, to show that a deed, absolute on its face, was intended as a mortgage. The question whether even admissible in a court of equity, except on the ground of fraud, mistake or surprise, was raised, but not decided.

Judgment reversed, 2 only voting for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-rice-nycterr-1799.