Webb v. Pennington County Board of Commissioners

88 F. App'x 983
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2004·No. 03-1220·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Webb appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The district court found, after a hearing, that Webb deliberately failed to comply with an order directing him to pay a monetary sanction for failing to appear at a deposition. Although as a general proposition, we are concerned about a district court’s use of such a severe sanction in a case of this sort, we find that under the facts of the case the court did not abuse its discretion. See Rodgers v. Curators of Univ. of Mo., 135 F.3d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir.1998) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Marshall P. Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. Pennington County Board of Commissioners, 88 F. App'x 983 (8th Cir. 2004).

88 F. App'x 983 (Webb v. Pennington County Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webb v. Pennington County Board of Commissioners
543 U.S. 889 (Supreme Court, 2004)