Webb v. Onizuka
384 F. App'x 608
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2010·No. No. 09-16391·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
David Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action arising from his purchase of a used vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 [609] U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Peralta v. Hispanic Bus., Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1068 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm the dismissal of each defendant because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webb v. Onizuka, 384 F. App'x 608 (9th Cir. 2010).
384 F. App'x 608 (Webb v. Onizuka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Igarashi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
D. Hawaii, 2019
Webb v. Onizuka
178 L. Ed. 2d 488 (Supreme Court, 2010)