Webb v. Norman

226 F. 1023, 141 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2274
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 1915
DocketNo. 2782
StatusPublished

This text of 226 F. 1023 (Webb v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. Norman, 226 F. 1023, 141 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2274 (5th Cir. 1915).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having fully considered the records and briefs in this case, we conclude that in and for the reasons assigned by the District Judge (219 Fed. 349) the case was correctly ruled. The petition to superintend and revise is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Webb
219 F. 349 (N.D. Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 F. 1023, 141 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-norman-ca5-1915.