Webb v. Norman
226 F. 1023, 141 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2274
Opinion
Having fully considered the records and briefs in this case, we conclude that in and for the reasons assigned by the District Judge (219 Fed. 349) the case was correctly ruled. The petition to superintend and revise is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webb v. Norman, 226 F. 1023, 141 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2274 (5th Cir. 1915).
226 F. 1023 (Webb v. Norman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Webb
219 F. 349 (N.D. Georgia, 1915)