Webb v. MAGELLAN HRSC, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Webb v. MAGELLAN HRSC, INC.

292 S.W.3d 582, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1362, 2009 WL 2948727

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 92472·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Monique Webb, the appellant, appeals pro se from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying unemployment compensation benefits to the appellant under the Missouri Employment Security Law, section 288.050.1(1), RSMo Supp.2007.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*583 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Monique Webb, the appellant, appeals pro se from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying unemployment compensation benefits to the appellant under the Missouri Employment Security Law, section 288.050.1(1), RSMo Supp.2007.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*583 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Webb v. MAGELLAN HRSC, INC., 292 S.W.3d 582, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1362, 2009 WL 2948727 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

292 S.W.3d 582 (Webb v. MAGELLAN HRSC, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.