Webb v. Jacobson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webb v. Jacobson

175 So. 3d 938, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14998, 2015 WL 5883425

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-4426

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 So. 3d 938 (Webb v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. Jacobson, 175 So. 3d 938, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14998, 2015 WL 5883425 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott Webb appeals the injunction for protection against stalking entered against him, and in favor of his former girlfriend, Nicole Jacobson. We affirm without discussion, except as to the provision in the [939]*939injunction prohibiting Webb from accessing any social media websites. That provision is overbroad. An injunction should never be broader than is necessary to provide the injured party the relief warranted by the circumstances of the particular case, without injustice to the party enjoined. Clark v. Allied Assocs., Inc., 477 So.2d 656, 657-58 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

We remand for the trial court to amend the injunction in such a manner to allow Webb to access social media websites and Craigslist, except as necessary to protect Ms. Jacobson and her friends, family, and employers from any direct or indirect contact by Webb, and from further intrusions of the nature set forth in her injunction petition.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott Webb appeals the injunction for protection against stalking entered against him, and in favor of his former girlfriend, Nicole Jacobson. We affirm without discussion, except as to the provision in the [939]*939injunction prohibiting Webb from accessing any social media websites. That provision is overbroad. An injunction should never be broader than is necessary to provide the injured party the relief warranted by the circumstances of the particular case, without injustice to the party enjoined. Clark v. Allied Assocs., Inc., 477 So.2d 656, 657-58 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

We remand for the trial court to amend the injunction in such a manner to allow Webb to access social media websites and Craigslist, except as necessary to protect Ms. Jacobson and her friends, family, and employers from any direct or indirect contact by Webb, and from further intrusions of the nature set forth in her injunction petition.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 3d 938, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14998, 2015 WL 5883425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-jacobson-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack