Webb v. Harp
This text of 38 Ga. 641 (Webb v. Harp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the report of this case, and the head note, (which contains the written decision made by ibis Court during the term,) there is no difficulty in understanding the point decided without further elaboration here. The complainant’s bill sets up a strong equity in his favor, and, as it is admitted that the defendants, who have taken possession of, and are trespassing upon the property, are insolvent, and unable to respond in damages, we think the Court did not err in refusing to dissolve the injunction on that ground. See Revised Code, section 3153.
• Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Ga. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-harp-ga-1869.