Webb v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Webb v. Greenberg

58 A.D.3d 637, 869 N.Y.S.2d 914

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 A.D.3d 637 (Webb v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb v. Greenberg, 58 A.D.3d 637, 869 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

[638]*638Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Sheldon Greenberg, a Judge of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, to furnish him with a certified copy of the minutes of the sentencing hearing in connection with a criminal action entitled People v Webb, commenced in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, under indictment No. 15290/95. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have original subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding, as no “justice of the supreme court or . . . judge of [the] county court or the court of general sessions” was named as a respondent (CPLR 506 [b] [1]). Since subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, the proceeding must be dismissed (see Matter of Nolan v Lungen, 61 NY2d 788 [1984]; Matter of Hamilton v Brown, 54 AD3d 760 [2008]; CPLR 7804 [b]; cf Matter of Law Offs. of Andrew F. Capoccia v Spitzer, 270 AD2d 643, 644 n 2 [2000]). Fisher, J.P, Flório, Garni and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[638]*638Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Sheldon Greenberg, a Judge of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, to furnish him with a certified copy of the minutes of the sentencing hearing in connection with a criminal action entitled People v Webb, commenced in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, under indictment No. 15290/95. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have original subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding, as no “justice of the supreme court or . . . judge of [the] county court or the court of general sessions” was named as a respondent (CPLR 506 [b] [1]). Since subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, the proceeding must be dismissed (see Matter of Nolan v Lungen, 61 NY2d 788 [1984]; Matter of Hamilton v Brown, 54 AD3d 760 [2008]; CPLR 7804 [b]; cf Matter of Law Offs. of Andrew F. Capoccia v Spitzer, 270 AD2d 643, 644 n 2 [2000]). Fisher, J.P, Flório, Garni and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.3d 637, 869 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-greenberg-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack