Webb v. Fitch
This text of 1 Root 177 (Webb v. Fitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner cannot be admitted to testify ; and it not being shown tbat be is deprived of his due, by any fraud in said administrators, he is equally barred of his remedy in equity as at law; this court cannot resume and ad[178]*178just claims which, ought to have been exhibited to, and adjusted by commissioners.
Petitioner withdrew his petition, and replied to- the Court of Probate, and had the commission of said commissioners renewed, and exhibited said debt to them, which they allowed, amounting to £10 19s. 2d. lawful money; and then the petitioner applied to this court in September, A. D. 1790, stating the aforesaid facts, and praying for an offset; which, was decreed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Root 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-fitch-connsuperct-1790.