Webb v. Fitch

1 Root 177
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The petitioner cannot be admitted to testify ; and it not being shown tbat be is deprived of his due, by any fraud in said administrators, he is equally barred of his remedy in equity as at law; this court cannot resume and ad[178]*178just claims which, ought to have been exhibited to, and adjusted by commissioners.

Petitioner withdrew his petition, and replied to- the Court of Probate, and had the commission of said commissioners renewed, and exhibited said debt to them, which they allowed, amounting to £10 19s. 2d. lawful money; and then the petitioner applied to this court in September, A. D. 1790, stating the aforesaid facts, and praying for an offset; which, was decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. Fitch, 1 Root 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 177 (Webb v. Fitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockwood v. Reynolds
16 Conn. 303 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1844)