Webb v. Fish
This text of 4 N.J.L. 371 (Webb v. Fish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Remarked that the award does not authorise the use of the road for the public. It is confined to the heirs and assigns of Eldridge; the evidence, therefore, that the defendant obstructed the public, was inadmissible. The' judgment is erroneous; it should have been entered for the penalty; but were this the only error, he would have been disposed to suspend the judgment until the amendment could be made by the court to which the writ of error was directed. As to the obstruction to the heirs, he expressed no decided opinion.
Rossell J. concurred with the Chief Justice. Southard J. was with the plaintiff in error, on all the points.
Judgment for plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 N.J.L. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-fish-nj-1817.