Webb v. Deboo

487 F. App'x 78
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2012·No. No. 12-6904·Published

Opinion

[79] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Eugene Webb appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Deboo, No. 2:09-cv-00107-JPB-JES, 2012 WL 1067971 (N.D W.Va. Mar. 29 & May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb v. Deboo, 487 F. App'x 78 (4th Cir. 2012).

487 F. App'x 78 (Webb v. Deboo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related