Webb v. City of Ferguson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Webb v. City of Ferguson

387 S.W.3d 409, 2012 WL 6139196, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2012·No. No. ED 98239·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Diane Prunty Webb (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the City of Ferguson (“City”) summary judgment on her petition for breach of contract. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Diane Prunty Webb (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the City of Ferguson (“City”) summary judgment on her petition for breach of contract. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Webb v. City of Ferguson, 387 S.W.3d 409, 2012 WL 6139196, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

387 S.W.3d 409 (Webb v. City of Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.