Webb v. Bowless
This text of 15 Ind. 242 (Webb v. Bowless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit by Webb against the-appellees, upon a promissory note made by them to one Hall, and by him indorsed to the plaintiff.
The defendants filed an answer of four paragraphs, to the whole of which a demurrer was filed and overruled, and exception taken. The plaintiff failing to reply, judgment was rendered for the defendants. The only question presented relates to the ruling of the Court upon the demurrer.
One paragraph of the answer set up that the note was given without any good or valuable consideration whatever. This was undoubtedly good. Clark v. Harrison, 5 Blackf. 302; [243]*243Webster v. Parker, 7 Ind. 185. The demurrer being to the Whole answer, and there being at least one good paragraph, the demurrer was correctly overruled. It is unnecessary to inquire into the other paragraphs of the answer, as the judgment would have to be affirmed, whether they he good or had.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ind. 242, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-bowless-ind-1860.