Webb v. Bowers

29 F. Cas. 501, 11 Law Rep. 84
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedOctober 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 29 F. Cas. 501 (Webb v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb v. Bowers, 29 F. Cas. 501, 11 Law Rep. 84 (circtdma 1847).

Opinion

Buie in relation to costs. The complainants had brought a bill in equity against the respondents for an alleged infringement of copyright. The case having been referred to the master at a former term was argued on his report, and the court refused to grant an injunction, but ordered the case to be continued to enable the complainants to bring a suit at law if they saw fit. The respondents moved that the bills be dismissed with costs, but WOODBUBY, Circuit Justice, held, that the ease seemed to come within one of the exceptions to the general rule, that costs must go with the prevailing party. The exception was that where the remedy in equity was refused, and yet the party plaintiff might proceed at law, costs would not be allowed. But the complainants must stipulate that they will not proceed at law or costs will be allowed. It was ordered that costs should be refused to both parties if the complainants should, within ten days, enter a stipulation not to proceed at law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 F. Cas. 501, 11 Law Rep. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-v-bowers-circtdma-1847.