Webb Oil Company, Inc. v. Holmes

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Webb Oil Company, Inc. v. Holmes

651 So. 2d 36, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 559, 1994 WL 646329

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedNovember 18, 1994

DocketAV93000421

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 So. 2d 36 (Webb Oil Company, Inc. v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webb Oil Company, Inc. v. Holmes, 651 So. 2d 36, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 559, 1994 WL 646329 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

In July 1993, Peggy Holmes filed a complaint against Webb Oil Company, Inc., and Federated Insurance Company (Webb Oil), for workmen’s compensation benefits.¹ Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court found that Holmes suffered a 75% permanent partial disability, and it awarded Holmes unpaid and future medical expenses and benefits. Webb Oil’s post-judgment motion was denied; hence, this appeal.

Webb Oil raises several issues on appeal; however, we find the dispositive issue to be whether the trial court erred in awarding benefits without finding that Holmes suffered a loss of ability to earn.

Although the trial court’s order included findings and conclusions of law, it did [37]*37not find any loss of Holmes’s ability to earn. Absent that finding, no grounds exist for awarding compensation. Marley Erectors, Inc. v. Rice, 560 So.2d 1083 (Ala.Civ.App.1990). Physical disability does not necessarily coincide with the loss of ability to earn. Wheeler v. Lake Forest Property Owners' Association, Inc., 523 So.2d 1083 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). Although no specific wording is required, there is nothing in this trial court’s order connecting Holmes’s disability with her earning capacity. Absent a finding that Holmes’s earning capacity was diminished by the disability, there is simply no basis for an award. Hooper v. Denney, 619 So.2d 1388 (Ala.Civ.App.1992).

Consequently, this court must reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a determination of whether Holmes suffered a loss of ability to earn upon which an award of workmen’s compensation benefits could be based.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

In July 1993, Peggy Holmes filed a complaint against Webb Oil Company, Inc., and Federated Insurance Company (Webb Oil), for workmen’s compensation benefits.¹ Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court found that Holmes suffered a 75% permanent partial disability, and it awarded Holmes unpaid and future medical expenses and benefits. Webb Oil’s post-judgment motion was denied; hence, this appeal.

Webb Oil raises several issues on appeal; however, we find the dispositive issue to be whether the trial court erred in awarding benefits without finding that Holmes suffered a loss of ability to earn.

Although the trial court’s order included findings and conclusions of law, it did [37]*37not find any loss of Holmes’s ability to earn. Absent that finding, no grounds exist for awarding compensation. Marley Erectors, Inc. v. Rice, 560 So.2d 1083 (Ala.Civ.App.1990). Physical disability does not necessarily coincide with the loss of ability to earn. Wheeler v. Lake Forest Property Owners' Association, Inc., 523 So.2d 1083 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). Although no specific wording is required, there is nothing in this trial court’s order connecting Holmes’s disability with her earning capacity. Absent a finding that Holmes’s earning capacity was diminished by the disability, there is simply no basis for an award. Hooper v. Denney, 619 So.2d 1388 (Ala.Civ.App.1992).

Consequently, this court must reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a determination of whether Holmes suffered a loss of ability to earn upon which an award of workmen’s compensation benefits could be based.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

651 So. 2d 36, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 559, 1994 WL 646329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-oil-company-inc-v-holmes-alacivapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack