Webb, Larry Thomas
This text of Webb, Larry Thomas (Webb, Larry Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,688-01
EX PARTE LARRY THOMAS WEBB, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 15F0870-005-A IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BOWIE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child
and sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Webb v. State, 557 S.W.3d 690 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2018). Applicant filed this
application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that in his aggravated sexual assault case appellate
counsel failed to raise sufficiency of the evidence and argue that the State failed to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt that he committed the aggravated element charged in the indictment, see TEX .
PENAL CODE § 22.021(a)(2)(A)(iii), before or during the course of the sexual assault. According to 2
the record, after Applicant sexually assaulted the complainant, he fell asleep in the living room of
his house. He then walked outside, asked where the complainant was, and said, “I’m going to kill
you and whoever you tell.”
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order
appellate counsel to respond to the above claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use
any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of
counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any
other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: April 15, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Webb, Larry Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-larry-thomas-texcrimapp-2020.