Home/Supreme Court/Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company

Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company

249 U.S. 591, 39 S. Ct. 389
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 28, 1919
Docket388
StatusPublished

This text of 249 U.S. 591 (Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company, 249 U.S. 591, 39 S. Ct. 389 (1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining *592 Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218.

Mr. Charles A. Seiders for plaintiff in error. Mr. Clarence Brown, Mr. John F. Wilson and Mr. Lloyd T. Williams for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 U.S. 591, 39 S. Ct. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webb-c-hayes-v-hocking-valley-railway-company-scotus-1919.