Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company

Supreme Court

Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company

249 U.S. 591, 39 S. Ct. 389

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 1919·No. 388·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining *592 Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218.

Mr. Charles A. Seiders for plaintiff in error. Mr. Clarence Brown, Mr. John F. Wilson and Mr. Lloyd T. Williams for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining *592 Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218.

Mr. Charles A. Seiders for plaintiff in error. Mr. Clarence Brown, Mr. John F. Wilson and Mr. Lloyd T. Williams for defendant in error.

Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company, 249 U.S. 591, 39 S. Ct. 389 (1919).

Pincite

249 U.S. 591 (Webb C. Hayes v. Hocking Valley Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related