Weaver v. Thomson
This text of 29 F. Cas. 493 (Weaver v. Thomson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I have repeatedly expressed my design of discouraging appeals unless there was some substantial grounds for them in a manifest error in the decree of the court below. In questions particularly of mere fact, and in those, like salvage, depending on sound discretion, I discourage them because they lead to speculations on the temperaments and dispositions of the respective judges, and are taken on a little besides a calculation of chances. Where the want of ground for the appeal is so obvious as to shew that the case must have been carried up here for delay merely, I see no ■objection to allowing a party to recover damages for any injury done by the delay to which he has thus put his opponent in a vexatious and unreasonable way. Amendment allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F. Cas. 493, 1 Wall. Jr. 343, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-thomson-circtedpa-1849.