Weaver v. State
313 S.W.3d 730, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 870, 2010 WL 2483274
Opinion
ORDER
Jerloin Weaver appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Weaver claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel in that he failed to file a motion to suppress or present evidence in support of a motion to suppress. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weaver v. State, 313 S.W.3d 730, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 870, 2010 WL 2483274 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
313 S.W.3d 730 (Weaver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
313 S.W.3d 730 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)