Weaver v. State

133 S.E. 314, 35 Ga. App. 401, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 397
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1926
Docket17278
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 314 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weaver v. State, 133 S.E. 314, 35 Ga. App. 401, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 397 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bloodworth:, J.

The evidence relied upon by the State to show the accused guilty of manufacturing intoxicating liquor was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Accordingly the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 314, 35 Ga. App. 401, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-gactapp-1926.