Weaver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Weaver v. State

100 S.E. 788, 24 Ga. App. 284, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 569

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 14, 1919

Docket10701

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 788 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. State, 100 S.E. 788, 24 Ga. App. 284, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The only point argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the defendant was illegally convicted because the only testimony connecting him with the offense charged was that of uncorroborated accomplices. The rule of law that the defendant in a criminal case can not legally be convicted upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice (Penal Code, § 1017) does not apply to misdemeanor cases.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The only point argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the defendant was illegally convicted because the only testimony connecting him with the offense charged was that of uncorroborated accomplices. The rule of law that the defendant in a criminal case can not legally be convicted upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice (Penal Code, § 1017) does not apply to misdemeanor cases.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 788, 24 Ga. App. 284, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-gactapp-1919.