Weaver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weaver v. State

608 So. 2d 947, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12442, 1992 WL 362125

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weaver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 588 So. 2d 53 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1992·No. No. 91-01444·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm both the revocation of the appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed. However, there was no evidence presented to the trial court to support several of the violations of probation included in the revocation order. The evidence did show that the appellant had absconded from his probation, and had committed a new law violation. The revocation order must be corrected to accurately reflect the evidence before the trial court. Dukes v. State, 528 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm both the revocation of the appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed. However, there was no evidence presented to the trial court to support several of the violations of probation included in the revocation order. The evidence did show that the appellant had absconded from his probation, and had committed a new law violation. The revocation order must be corrected to accurately reflect the evidence before the trial court. Dukes v. State, 528 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Weaver v. State, 608 So. 2d 947, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12442, 1992 WL 362125 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

608 So. 2d 947 (Weaver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related