Weaver v. State

938 S.W.2d 234, 327 Ark. 425, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 95
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 24, 1997
DocketCR 97-146
StatusPublished

This text of 938 S.W.2d 234 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weaver v. State, 938 S.W.2d 234, 327 Ark. 425, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 95 (Ark. 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Paul Eddie Weaver, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Larry Hartsfield, accepts responsibility for failing to file a timely notice of appeal.

We treat this motion as one for belated appeal and grant the motion. Failure on the part of counsel to perfect an appeal for a criminal defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes good cause for granting a belated appeal. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 S.W.2d 234, 327 Ark. 425, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-ark-1997.