Weaver v. Reichert

Ohio Court of Appeals

Weaver v. Reichert

32 N.E. 442, 32 N.E.2d 442, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 697, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1669

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1924·No. No. 2394·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HAMILTON, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This action was instituted in the Cincinnati Municipal Court wherein judgment against Reichert was rendered. Pie then appealed to the Hamilton Common Pleas, wherein a motion to strike the appeal from the files was sustained. Error was prosecuted to the Court of Appeals. On March 10, 1924, the latter court reversed the Common Pleas but on reconsideration held:

There is no inherent right of appeal, and, since 1558-9 GC. gives no such right, .10283 GC. does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAMILTON, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This action was instituted in the Cincinnati Municipal Court wherein judgment against Reichert was rendered. Pie then appealed to the Hamilton Common Pleas, wherein a motion to strike the appeal from the files was sustained. Error was prosecuted to the Court of Appeals. On March 10, 1924, the latter court reversed the Common Pleas but on reconsideration held:

There is no inherent right of appeal, and, since 1558-9 GC. gives no such right, .10283 GC. does not apply.

Weaver v. Reichert, 32 N.E. 442, 32 N.E.2d 442, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 697, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1669 (Ohio Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

32 N.E. 442 (Weaver v. Reichert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related