Weaver v. Reichert

32 N.E. 442, 32 N.E.2d 442, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 697, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1669
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 21, 1924
DocketNo. 2394
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 N.E. 442 (Weaver v. Reichert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weaver v. Reichert, 32 N.E. 442, 32 N.E.2d 442, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 697, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1669 (Ohio Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

HAMILTON, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This action was instituted in the Cincinnati Municipal Court wherein judgment against Reichert was rendered. Pie then appealed to the Hamilton Common Pleas, wherein a motion to strike the appeal from the files was sustained. Error was prosecuted to the Court of Appeals. On March 10, 1924, the latter court reversed the Common Pleas but on reconsideration held:

There is no inherent right of appeal, and, since 1558-9 GC. gives no such right, .10283 GC. does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sroufe v. Guttman
32 N.E.2d 444 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1940)
Kappner v. Dolan
23 Ohio Law. Abs. 555 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.E. 442, 32 N.E.2d 442, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 697, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-reichert-ohioctapp-1924.