Weaver v. Reichert

Ohio Supreme Court

Weaver v. Reichert

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 708

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 14, 1924

DocketNo. 18657

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 708 (Weaver v. Reichert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. Reichert, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 708 (Ohio 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Epitomized Opinion

Reichert recovered judgment on check against Weaver in Cincinnati Municipal Court. Weaver set up defense that the note was given for gambling debt and by cross-bill of particulars attempted to recover $165 lost by gambling in Reichert’s place. This was dismissed. He then appealed, a general appeal under 11215 GC., to the Common Pleas. Reich-ert moved to .strike appeal from files. Done. This was affirmed on rehearing by Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Epitomized Opinion

Reichert recovered judgment on check against Weaver in Cincinnati Municipal Court. Weaver set up defense that the note was given for gambling debt and by cross-bill of particulars attempted to recover $165 lost by gambling in Reichert’s place. This was dismissed. He then appealed, a general appeal under 11215 GC., to the Common Pleas. Reich-ert moved to .strike appeal from files. Done. This was affirmed on rehearing by Court of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-reichert-ohio-1924.