Weaver v. Painter
3 A. 839, 2 Sadler 395, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 605
Opinion
There was clearly no error in refusing to strike from the record a judgment regular on its face. Under the evidence, the opening of the judgment to the extent of $50, the sum in dispute, is certainly quite as much relief as the plaintiffs in error are entitled to in equity.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weaver v. Painter, 3 A. 839, 2 Sadler 395, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 605 (Pa. 1886).
3 A. 839 (Weaver v. Painter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keystone Bank of Spangler v. Booth
6 A.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)