Weaver v. Painter
3 A. 839, 2 Sadler 395, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 605
This text of 3 A. 839 (Weaver v. Painter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weaver v. Painter, 3 A. 839, 2 Sadler 395, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 605 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
There was clearly no error in refusing to strike from the record a judgment regular on its face. Under the evidence, the opening of the judgment to the extent of $50, the sum in dispute, is certainly quite as much relief as the plaintiffs in error are entitled to in equity.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Keystone Bank of Spangler v. Booth
6 A.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A. 839, 2 Sadler 395, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-painter-pa-1886.