Weaver v. McKnight

44 A.3d 183, 305 Conn. 907
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 30, 2012·No. SC 18974·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

44 A.3d 183 (2012)
305 Conn. 907

Dorothy WEAVER, Coadministrator (Estate of Demarius Douglas Weaver), et al.
v.
Craig MCKNIGHT et al.

SC 18974

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 30, 2012.

D. Lincoln Woodard, in support of the petition.

Thomas W. Boyce, New London, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 652, 40 A.3d 786, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding testimony by the *184 plaintiffs' two experts, both of whom are board certified in obstetrics and gynecology?"

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver v. McKnight, 44 A.3d 183, 305 Conn. 907 (Colo. 2012).

44 A.3d 183 (Weaver v. McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weaver v. McKnight
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014