Weaver v. McKnight
This text of 44 A.3d 183 (Weaver v. McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dorothy WEAVER, Coadministrator (Estate of Demarius Douglas Weaver), et al.
v.
Craig MCKNIGHT et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
D. Lincoln Woodard, in support of the petition.
Thomas W. Boyce, New London, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 652, 40 A.3d 786, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding testimony by the *184 plaintiffs' two experts, both of whom are board certified in obstetrics and gynecology?"
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.3d 183, 305 Conn. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-mcknight-conn-2012.