Weaver v. Industrial Trust Company

51 A. 1050, 24 R.I. 35, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 13
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 24, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The statutes affecting the status of an ad-ministratrix who has married after appointment are by no means clear.

(1) By Pub. Stat. cap. 184, § 20, the marriage vacated the office.

Gen. Laws cap. 194, §11, provides that a married woman may not be administratrix ‘‘by appointment of any court.”

These words are used in distinction from appointment by will in the same section.

We think that as the provision of the Public Statutes is repealed and the provision of the General Laws does not specify the same thing, the words “may not be administra-trix, trustee or guardian, by the appointment of any court ” must be construed to apply to the appointment of one who is married at the time of appointment, and not to the vacating of the office by one who marries after the appointment.

The plaintiff, therefore, was entitled to demand the money as administratrix, and judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weaver v. Industrial Trust Company, 51 A. 1050, 24 R.I. 35, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 13 (R.I. 1902).

51 A. 1050 (Weaver v. Industrial Trust Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holman v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas
152 S.W. 885 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)